Collaborate dispute resolution
is a process that couples voluntarily may chose as an alternate way to resolve
their issues in a divorce, legal separation, or other relationship termination without
having to litigate issues in court. It is similar in ways to mediation however,
it takes a more holistic approach by involving attorneys, counselors, financial
advisors, tax advisors and any other professional who may be needed to help the
parties settle their issues. Unlike
mediation, where no legal advice is provided to the parties by the mediator,
the parties are each represented by legal counsel.
In order for this process to work both parties need to agree
to participate in the collaborative process, typically in writing as well as
the following:
1. They agree to fully disclose all relevant information to
each other in the spirit of mutual cooperation and the avoidance of litigation.
2. They agree to act in good faith in the process and the
goal of reaching a solution/settlement that is acceptable to each of them.
3. They each have their own attorney (typically one that is
a collaborative practitioner or will act in such capacity) and accept that their
attorney’s representation will end if the matter becomes contested. This is
known as a “limited scope” representation.
This is also different than mediation where the parties may have an
attorney advise them during mediation, but then later represent them in court
if they are unable to reach an agreement in mediation.
4. The parties agree to engage the services of financial,
tax, mental health, and/or other professionals to the extent their situation
warrants, to evaluate the facts and then advise and make recommendations to the
parties. These professionals will also stop their representation if the matter
becomes contested.
The benefits of this process is that the parties feel much
more in control of the outcome and solutions. All persons involved become very familiar with
the family, the financial issues, and all other relevant factors that go into
the solution that becomes the mutual agreement.
Decisions are not left to the courts that often have very limited
familiarity with the particular case and facts, nor really know the parties
involved other than what they may see in their courtroom or read in the court
pleadings. And finally, there is more trust in the process and confidence in
the final agreement because the parties are each providing information to each
other freely and openly.
To find out if collaborative practice is right for you, call
Amy Alvis at Alvis Frantz and Associates at 925-516-1617. Amy is a member of the International Academy of Collaborative
Professionals.